Empirical studies support Boekaerts' Dual Processing model, including task-specific appraisals predicting learning intention and neural-network prediction of performance groups¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Neural networks predicted which students would fall in poor, mid, or high writing performance groups with accuracy ranging 94 and 100% based on 56 predictors. → Panadero 2017
Evidence¶
Panadero 2017¶
Panadero, E. (2017). A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8:422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports a neural-network modeling analysis of students' self-regulation system characteristics predicting writing performance groups, with "high accuracy (ranging 94 and 100%)". This is a predictive modeling result, not an experiment; no standardized effect size is printed.
"It was found that neural networks could predict with high accuracy (ranging 94 and 100%) which students would be in the poor, mid, or high performance groups, based on 56 predictors."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Neural network models predicted students' writing performance groups with 94–100% accuracy from self-regulation characteristics — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
empirical-support-boekaerts-dual-processing |
title |
Empirical studies support Boekaerts' Dual Processing model, including task-specific appraisals predicting learning intention and neural-network prediction of performance groups |
description |
Empirical studies support Boekaerts' Dual Processing model, including task-specific appraisals predicting learning intention and neural-network prediction of performance groups |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
recheck_by |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — panadero-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.