Pass rates and final course grades did not differ significantly between emporium and traditional lecture sections¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The pass rate difference between emporium and traditional sections was not statistically significant. → Cousins-Cooper 2017
q3 i? In logistic regression with covariate adjustment, the emporium method's odds ratio for passing was not statistically different from the traditional method's. → Cousins-Cooper 2017 (2)
Evidence¶
Cousins-Cooper 2017¶
Cousins-Cooper, K., Staley, K. N., Kim, S., & Luke, N. S. (2017). The Effect of the Emporium Instructional Method on Students' Performance in College Algebra and Trigonometry. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1-13. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1129978
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Chi-square comparison of pass status (A, B, C as pass) between 970 emporium and 842 traditional students; pass rates were 72.14% versus 69.94% with "p‐value = 0.3206".
"However, the pass rate of students between the emporium and traditional lecture sections is not statistically significant (p‐value = 0.3206) where A, B and C were considered as the pass status."
Cousins-Cooper 2017 (2)¶
Cousins-Cooper, K., Staley, K. N., Kim, S., & Luke, N. S. (2017). The Effect of the Emporium Instructional Method on Students' Performance in College Algebra and Trigonometry. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(1), 1-13. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1129978
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Logistic regression of pass status on instruction method and covariates after dichotomizing letter grades; the emporium odds ratio was 0.98 (0.6-1.59) with "p‐value = 0.9301", unchanged when ACT replaced SAT scores.
"The odds ratio of the emporium method is not statistically different from that of the Traditional method (p‐value = 0.9301)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students in emporium college algebra sections scored approximately 12 points higher on the posttest than students in traditional lecture sections — related
- Multiple posttest attempts in the emporium method did not boost posttest scores; single-attempt students scored higher — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.