Claims

Dual language narrative intervention produced a large English vocabulary gain (d = .98) but only a small Spanish vocabulary gain (d = .34)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-11-03 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 Spanish receptive knowledge of the targeted words showed only a small effect (d = .34), with several children performing the same or worse at posttest. → Spencer et al. 2019

Evidence

Spencer et al. 2019

Trina D. Spencer, Douglas B. Petersen, M. Adelaida Restrepo, Marilyn Thompson, and Maria Nelly Gutierrez Arvizu. (2019). The Effect of Spanish and English Narrative Intervention on the Language Skills of Young Dual Language Learners. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121418779439

q2 · i1 · causal · r1

Same pretest–posttest vocabulary assessment administered in Spanish. Mean rose from 5.4 to 6.0; the article characterizes the change as "a small effect (d = .34)" and notes several children performed the same or worse at posttest.

"For Spanish vocabulary, the mean score at pretest was 5.4 (SD = 2.2) and the mean score at posttest was 6.0 (SD = 2.1)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.