Faculty enthusiasm for online teaching declined from the acceleration phase to the stasis phase across all profiles¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Enthusiasm was lower at Snapshot 2 than at Snapshot 1 across all four profiles, while resolutions maintained a similar trend. → Trevisan 2023

Evidence¶

Trevisan 2023¶

Trevisan, O., De Rossi, M., Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Smits, A. (2023). Factors shaping faculty online teaching competencies during the Covid-19 pandemic. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10197-1

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Descriptive comparison of cluster means plotted in Fig. 1 for Enthusiasm, Resolutions and perceived Support at both snapshots. The article notes that in the struggling and compliant profiles, together 57% of respondents, resolutions were positive while enthusiasm was negative.

"As shown in Fig. 1, Enthusiasm was lower at S2 than at S1 across all profiles. Resolutions maintained a similar trend, while perceived Support was rated differently by the profiles at S2 versus S1"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• One year into the pandemic, faculty clustered into four new profiles (Struggling, Self-reliant, Complying, Thriving) that differed in technology-engagement practices measured with the ICAP scale — related
• During the pandemic acceleration phase, higher education faculty fell into four distinct online-teaching profiles (Cautious, Open, Optimistic, Enthusiastic) differing in enthusiasm, resolutions, and perceived support — related
• The factors underpinning faculty online-teaching profiles shifted over the pandemic: internal dispositions dominated at Snapshot 1, while perceived institutional support and enthusiasm dominated at Snapshot 2 — related
• Faculty dispositions and use of technological affordances for online teaching changed over time during the pandemic — a broader claim this one bears on