On a control-aligned portal test taken immediately after instruction, GPA-based groups showed no significant difference from the control group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? There was no statistically significant difference between the experimental groups and the control group on the EPA post-instruction test. → Celal Boyraz 2017

Evidence¶

Celal Boyraz 2017¶

Celal Boyraz, Gökhan Serin. (2017). Science Instruction through the Game and Physical Activities Course: An Interdisciplinary Teaching Practice. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(11). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051119

q3 · i? · causal · r1

One-way ANOVA on the EPA test, built from the control group's web portal end-of-unit tests to guard against researcher bias, administered to all groups after instruction; no significant group difference was found and no effect size was printed. Equivalence was not tested.

"there was no statistically significant difference between the experimental groups that received science instruction integrated with the GPA course, and the control group, F(3,78)=1.828, p>.05."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• GPA-based interdisciplinary science instruction produced significantly higher science achievement than regular instruction after five weeks — reports the opposite
• All three GPA-based groups retained significantly more science knowledge than the control group six months after instruction — reports the opposite
• On the EPA retention test, only the group taught concepts during the activities significantly outperformed the control group — related