Claims

Students in ePortfolio-based Personal Development Plan sections had significantly higher first-year GPAs and retention than non-ePDP peers, but gains were not sustained without intensive professional development

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on an ERIC document (a report, conference paper or thesis). It is kept because 3 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the 2010-2011 ePDP pilot, students in sections taught by faculty who received intensive professional development had significantly higher first-year GPAs and first-to-second-semester retention rates than students in non-ePDP sections. → epdp-pilot q2 i? The pilot-year student success results were not consistently sustained in later years when intensive professional development was not repeated. → epdp-sustain

Evidence

epdp-pilot

Kahn, S., Freeman, T., & Powell, A. A. (2021, November). IUPUI's HIP taxonomy for ePortfolio: A tool for development, implementation, and scaling (Occasional Paper No. 57). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED619086

q2 · i? · design · r2

Campus report of the 2010-2011 University College ePDP pilot, in which a small group of faculty volunteers completed an intensive two-week professional development program focused on reflection before teaching ePDP sections. The article reports that these students "had significantly higher first-year GPAs and first-to-second-semester retention rates" than non-ePDP peers; no effect size is printed.

"Students in sections taught by those faculty members had significantly higher first-year GPAs and first-to-second-semester retention rates than students in non-ePDP sections."

epdp-sustain

Kahn, S., Freeman, T., & Powell, A. A. (2021, November). IUPUI's HIP taxonomy for ePortfolio: A tool for development, implementation, and scaling (Occasional Paper No. 57). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED619086

q2 · i? · design · r2

Follow-up observation reported by the authors, citing Buyarski (2016): after the pilot, University College could not offer the same intensive professional development to later adopters, and the pilot-year gains were "not consistently sustained." No statistics are printed for the later years.

"But University College lacked the resources to offer a similar intensive professional development experience to the many faculty members who adopted the ePDP in subsequent years, and the student success results from the pilot year were not consistently sustained (Buyarski, 2016)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id epdp-pilot-gpa-retention-gains-not-sustained
title Students in ePortfolio-based Personal Development Plan sections had significantly higher first-year GPAs and retention than non-ePDP peers, but gains were not sustained without intensive professional development
description Students in ePortfolio-based Personal Development Plan sections had significantly higher first-year GPAs and retention than non-ePDP peers, but gains were not sustained without intensive professional development
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — epdp-pilot, epdp-sustain

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.