Dialogic noticing gains occurred in nearly all episodes — with significant increases in episodes 2, 3, 5, 7, and 9 — except episode 6, which did not change¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Per-episode paired t-tests showed significant increases (p < 0.05) in teachers' noticing in episodes 2, 3, 5, 7, and 9; increases occurred in all episodes except episode 6 (24 to 23, t = 0.22, not significant). → Benzi Slakmon 2024
Evidence¶
Benzi Slakmon 2024¶
Benzi Slakmon, Rotem Abdu. (2024). Learning to notice collaboration: examining the impact of professional development on mathematics teachers’ enhanced awareness in CSCL settings. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn 19:137–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09423-6
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Series of two-tailed paired-samples t-tests per episode across 14 teachers, with per-episode pre/post counts in Table 4 (average total noticing rose from 10.7 to 24.1). Significance values and episode-level counts are printed; no standardized effect size is reported.
"In particular, we observed increases in dialogic utterances per all episodes but one (episode 6). In particular, we observed significant increases (p < 0.05) in teachers’ noticing of dialogue in episodes 2,3,5,7, and 9 (Table 4)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The increase in noticing dialogue was accompanied by a decrease in noticing mathematical activity, described as attentional tunneling — a design consideration for integrated dialogue-plus-content noticing training — related
- Individual trajectories varied: 9 of 14 teachers increased dialogic noticing per episode, while two teachers slightly decreased, which the authors attribute to limits of the nondirective intervention — related
- The intervention significantly increased teachers' noticing of six dialogic attributes — persuasive interaction, one leads and another is led, agreement and collective attention, students have equal status, dialogic gap, and monologue — but not of dialogue-expansion attributes — related
- After a dialogic-focused professional development intervention, mathematics teachers noticed student dialogue significantly more, in both attending (83 to 170 cases) and responding (24 to 71 cases) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
episode-level-noticing-increases |
title |
Dialogic noticing gains occurred in nearly all episodes — with significant increases in episodes 2, 3, 5, 7, and 9 — except episode 6, which did not change |
description |
Dialogic noticing gains occurred in nearly all episodes — with significant increases in episodes 2, 3, 5, 7, and 9 — except episode 6, which did not change |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — benzi-slakmon-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.