Epistemic distancing plays a critical role in student groups' construction of a safe space for collaborative sensemaking in physics tutorials¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students use hedging, joking, quoting, and questioning to soften their stances, protecting themselves from affective risk and enabling generation and evaluation of ideas. → Conlin 2012
Evidence¶
Conlin 2012¶
Conlin, L. D., & Scherr, R. E. (2012). Making Space to Sensemake: Epistemic Distancing in Small Group Physics Discussions. Preprint under review. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=Making+Space+to+Sensemake
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Close qualitative discourse analysis of videotaped first discussions of three tutorial groups from a ~2,000-hour corpus at the University of Maryland. The article reports that "epistemic distancing played a key role" in each group's safe space; no effect size is printed.
"A core finding is that epistemic distancing played a key role in each groups' construction of a safe space to collaboratively make sense of mechanisms."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- A TA's intervention that incrementally added epistemic distancing to his questions shifted a dismissive group into sensemaking with a lasting effect — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- A new group member's heavily distanced bid to discuss shifted the Bronze group's norms toward sharing and evaluating ideas — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- The yellow behavioral cluster corresponds to a joking frame in which ambiguous tone protects students who venture risky ideas — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Both too much and too little epistemic distancing can shut down group discussion — related
- Tutorial groups varied widely in when they first entered collaborative sensemaking, from about 13 minutes to nearly 53 minutes of tutorial time — related
- Four distinct, reliably codable behavioral clusters appear in collaborative tutorial video data — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
epistemic-distancing-builds-safe-space-sensemaking |
title |
Epistemic distancing plays a critical role in student groups' construction of a safe space for collaborative sensemaking in physics tutorials |
description |
Epistemic distancing plays a critical role in student groups' construction of a safe space for collaborative sensemaking in physics tutorials |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2012 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — conlin-2012 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.