Claims

Weekly pre-test scores showed no significant treatment-control differences in eight of ten weeks; control scored higher in the first two weeks (p<.05)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2020: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Baseline knowledge was statistically comparable between groups for most of the course, with control students scoring higher only in the first two weeks. → Phuong 2017

Evidence

Phuong 2017

Phuong, A. E., Nguyen, J., & Mariea, D. (2017). Evaluating an Adaptive Equity-Oriented Pedagogy: A Study of its Impacts in Higher Education. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 17(2), 5-44. https://uncw.edu/jet

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Weekly pre-test comparison across the ten-week course in the two-section study. The article reports "no statistically significant differences on the wee kly pre-test scores" for eight weeks, with control higher in weeks one and two ( p<.05); equivalence was not formally tested.

"For eight of the ten weeks, there were no statistically significant differences on the wee kly pre-test scores. The only exception was in the first two weeks, when the students in the control group had scores that were higher than the treatment ( p<.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.