Weekly gain scores favored the treatment group throughout the course, rising from the low 40s to the low 60s while control stayed near 30 points¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The treatment group showed a consistent pattern of outperforming the control group on weekly posttest-minus-pretest gain scores. → Phuong 2017

Evidence¶

Phuong 2017¶

Phuong, A. E., Nguyen, J., & Mariea, D. (2017). Evaluating an Adaptive Equity-Oriented Pedagogy: A Study of its Impacts in Higher Education. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 17(2), 5-44. https://uncw.edu/jet

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Repeated-measures weekly gain scores (posttest minus pretest on 10-question tests each class meeting) compared between the two sections. The article states "the treatment group outperformed the control group" consistently, with treatment gains rising to the low 60s versus about 30 points weekly in control.

"In the beginning, students in the treatment had an average gain score that started in the low 40s and eventually increased to the low 60s. By contrast, the students in the control group had an average gain score of about 30 points every week"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students in the adaptive equity-oriented pedagogy section earned significantly higher final assessment scores than control students (p<.0001) — related
• Inquiry-based students' scores increased at a faster pace than subject matter students' scores over the twelve-week study — related
• Struggling K–6 readers tutored twice weekly by minimally trained college students made significantly greater gains than controls in letter-word identification, word attack, and passage comprehension — related