Claims

The treatment group's advantage did not extend to the organization subscale of writing

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The treatment group did not achieve significantly greater gains than the control group on the organization subscale. → Mermelstein 2015

Evidence

Mermelstein 2015

Mermelstein, A. D. (2015). Improving EFL learners’ writing through enhanced extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(2), 182–198. http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Group-gain comparison in the results section of the one-year university ER study. The article reports no significant TG-over-CG gain for organization; no effect size is printed for this null comparison.

"The one subscale where the TG did not achieve significant gains over the CG was organization."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.