Claims

Incorporating the extensive reading approach into vocabulary instruction significantly improves high-intermediate EFL learners' lexical depth

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? After a 17-week ER treatment, the treatment group's WAT lexical depth scores were significantly higher than the control group's (mean difference -14.100, t(38) = -3.234, p = .003). → Jafarpour 2014

Evidence

Jafarpour 2014

Mohsen Jafarpour. (2014). The Effect of Incorporating the Extensive Reading Approach into Vocabulary Instruction on Learners' Lexical Depth in an EFL Context. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.3p.162

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Independent t test comparing Read's WAT scores of 20 treatment and 20 control students after 4 months; the article reports "t (38) = -3.234" at p < .05 with a mean difference of -14.100 at 95% confidence. No effect size is printed.

"It shows that the difference is statistically significant, t (38) = -3.234, at p < .05, 2-tailed. Therefore, the null hypothesis of no difference between group means was rejected."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.