Emotion regulation variables predict interpersonal outcomes (peer nominations of understanding others and leadership potential) beyond Big Five traits and gender¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Performance-tested ERA and teacher-observed emotion regulation each independently predict peer nominations of understanding others and leadership potential after controlling for Big Five traits and gender. → Ivcevic Zorana; Eggers Catherine 2021 q3 i? Adding emotion regulation variables significantly increases explained variance for understanding others (ΔR2 = 0.063) and leadership potential (ΔR2 = 0.076). → Ivcevic Zorana; Eggers Catherine 2021

Evidence¶

Ivcevic Zorana; Eggers Catherine 2021¶

Ivcevic Zorana; Eggers Catherine. (2021). Emotion Regulation Ability: Test Performance and Observer Reports in Predicting Relationship, Achievement and Well-Being Outcomes in Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003666/

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Hierarchical regression in the same 220-student sample showed Step 2 emotion regulation variables significantly predicted "understanding others, ΔR2 = 0.063, p = 0.001, and leadership potential, ΔR2 = 0.076, p < 0.001" beyond Big Five traits and gender.

"As predicted by our first hypothesis, emotion regulation variables significantly predicted understanding others, ΔR2 = 0.063, p = 0.001, and leadership potential, ΔR2 = 0.076, p < 0.001."

Ivcevic Zorana; Eggers Catherine 2021 (2)¶

Ivcevic Zorana; Eggers Catherine. (2021). Emotion Regulation Ability: Test Performance and Observer Reports in Predicting Relationship, Achievement and Well-Being Outcomes in Adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003666/

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Both measures were independent predictors: "Performance-tested ERA and teacher-observed emotion regulation were significant independent predictors for understanding others" with β = 0.16 and β = 0.21 respectively, and for leadership potential with β = 0.22 and β = 0.20.

"Performance-tested ERA and teacher-observed emotion regulation were significant independent predictors for understanding others (β = 0.16, p = 0.029 and β = 0.21, p = 0.003, respectively) and leadership potential (β = 0.22, p = 0.005, and β = 0.20, p = 0.006), supporting again Hypothesis 2."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Performance-tested ERA and teacher-observed emotion regulation are only modestly correlated (r = 0.22), suggesting they measure distinct constructs — related
• Emotion regulation variables do not predict overall subjective happiness beyond Big Five traits and gender, and only performance-tested ERA predicts school satisfaction — related
• Emotion regulation variables predict academic outcomes (GPA and academic honors) beyond Big Five personality traits and gender in high school students — related
• Teacher-observed emotion regulation correlates with academic outcomes more strongly than performance-tested ERA does — related
• Emotion differentiation is linked to more effective emotion regulation and more accurate understanding of others' emotions — related