Claims

Erroneous examples were beneficial only in combination with elaborated feedback, not with corrective feedback alone

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In clinical-scenario studies, ErrEx was beneficial only when combined with elaborated feedback; ErrEx with corrective feedback alone was not beneficial. → Sonja Dieterich 2025

Evidence

Sonja Dieterich 2025

Sonja Dieterich, Stefan Rumann, Marc Rodemer. (2025). Conditions for Effective Learning from Erroneous Examples: A Systematic Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10071-x

q2 · i? · review · r3

Table 1 entries for Kopp et al. (2008) and Kopp et al. (2009a, b), ErrEx vs CorrEx comparisons in clinical scenarios, report that "ErrEx only beneficial in combina- tion with EFB". The influential factor coded was elaborated feedback, with a study prompt used.

"ErrEx only beneficial in combina- tion with EFB. ErrEx + CFB not beneficial"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id errex-beneficial-only-with-elaborated-feedback
title Erroneous examples were beneficial only in combination with elaborated feedback, not with corrective feedback alone
description Erroneous examples were beneficial only in combination with elaborated feedback, not with corrective feedback alone
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sonja-dieterich-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.