Error framing is expected to induce differential mastery and performance-avoid orientations, shaping self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q1
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Framing errors as instructive induces a mastery orientation, while instructing trainees to avoid errors induces a performance-avoid orientation; neither framing is expected to affect performance-prove goals. → Bell 2008
Evidence¶
Bell 2008¶
Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008). Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 296-316. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/articles/410/
q1 · i? · causal · r?
Theoretical argument in the Training Frame section: errors serve as salient feedback in complex task learning, and how learners interpret errors distinguishes goal-orientation dimensions. The article also states the inductions are not expected to significantly impact performance-prove goals since neither approach emphasizes performance demonstration.
"Thus, we expect that the differential framing of errors will induce different levels of mastery and performance-avoid orientations, which, in turn, are expected to influence trainees' self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Most motivational and self-regulation measures did not differ by competitive preference, though overall interest in educational psychology declined over the semester — related
- Trait goal orientation is expected to moderate error-framing effects, with framing most powerful for trainees low in the corresponding trait orientation — related
- Praise for intelligence, rather than for effort, after success undermines children's motivation and performance after a later failure — related
- Self-determination theory holds that autonomy support raises intrinsic motivation, and a meta-analysis finds expected tangible rewards undermine it — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
error-framing-induces-goal-orientations |
title |
Error framing is expected to induce differential mastery and performance-avoid orientations, shaping self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation |
description |
Error framing is expected to induce differential mastery and performance-avoid orientations, shaping self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2008 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — bell-2008 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.