Claims

In two federal youth initiatives, the same liaisons provided evaluation technical assistance to both the grantee service-providing group and the local evaluator

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-18 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In YARH and P3, liaisons worked with grantees who were developing interventions and planning or conducting evaluations at the same time, and the same liaisons provided ETA to both the grantee/service providing group and the local evaluator. → Andrew Gothro 2022

Evidence

Andrew Gothro 2022

Andrew Gothro, Elías S. Hanno, M. C. Bradley. (2022). Challenges and Solutions in Evaluation Technical Assistance During Design and Early Implementation. Evaluation Review, vol. 46, issue 1. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/challenges-and-solutions-in-evaluation-technical-assistance-during-design-and-early-implementation doi:10.1177/0193841x20911527

q2 · i? · qualitative · r?

A case study of two federal grant initiatives describes the shared ETA model the programs used. The authors state the programs shared "a focus on building evidence, a focus on disconnected youth" and this dual-audience liaison arrangement; no effect sizes are reported.

"use of liaisons to work with grantees who are developing interventions and planning or conducting evaluations at the same time, and having the same liaisons provide ETA to both the grantee/service providing group and the local evaluator"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id eta-same-liaisons-grantee-and-evaluator
title In two federal youth initiatives, the same liaisons provided evaluation technical assistance to both the grantee service-providing group and the local evaluator
description In two federal youth initiatives, the same liaisons provided evaluation technical assistance to both the grantee service-providing group and the local evaluator
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2022
source_checked 2026-10-18
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — andrew-gothro-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.