Claims

Aggregate course evaluations moved modestly against the 2023 offering and written comments split, with a share of the cohort critiquing the instructor's own AI use

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Against Spring 2023, the overall summative median was 3.8 against 3.9, the instructor-contribution median 3.8 against 4.1, and the challenge-and-engagement index 4.2 against 5.1, with the college decile rank falling from four to two. → Yusuf Pisan 2026

Evidence

Yusuf Pisan 2026

Yusuf Pisan. (2026). Teaching Intro AI When the Tools Can Do the Homework: A Course Redesign and a Student Bill of Rights. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05175 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.05175

q1 · i? · design · r2

Aggregate anonymous IASystem course evaluations for the 46-student Spring 2026 section, compared descriptively with the same course by the same instructor in Spring 2023. The author reports these as context rather than as an effect of any single change, since the comparison is uncontrolled and the cohorts differ.

"the overall summative median was 3.8 against 3.9 in 2023, the instructor-contribution median 3.8 against 4.1, and the challenge-and-engagement index 4.2 against 5.1, with the course's college decile rank falling from four to two."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id evaluations-split-on-redesigned-ai-course
title Aggregate course evaluations moved modestly against the 2023 offering and written comments split, with a share of the cohort critiquing the instructor's own AI use
description Aggregate course evaluations moved modestly against the 2023 offering and written comments split, with a share of the cohort critiquing the instructor's own AI use
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
recheck_by 2029
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — yusuf-pisan-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.