Claims

Participants with evaluativist epistemic beliefs are more likely to write two-sided reports than those with absolutist or multiplist epistemic beliefs

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A chi-square test of independence showed a significant relation between epistemic perspective (Evaluativists vs. Non-Evaluativists) and my-side bias (one-sided vs. two-sided report), χ2(1) = 4.508, p = .044. → Iordanou 2020

Evidence

Iordanou 2020

Iordanou, K., Kendeou, P., & Zembylas, M. (2020). Examining my-side bias during and after reading controversial historical accounts. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09240-w

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Chi-square test examining whether epistemic perspective and my-side bias in written summaries were independent. Nine participants were evaluativists; the remaining 30 were absolutist or multiplist. Evaluativists were more likely to produce two-sided reports.

"A chi-square test of independence showed a significant relation (χ2 (1) = 4.508, 4.059, p = .044). Participants holding evaluativist epistemic beliefs were more likely to write two-sided reports than participants holding absolutist or multiplist epistemic beliefs."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id evaluativist-beliefs-two-sided-reports
title Participants with evaluativist epistemic beliefs are more likely to write two-sided reports than those with absolutist or multiplist epistemic beliefs
description Participants with evaluativist epistemic beliefs are more likely to write two-sided reports than those with absolutist or multiplist epistemic beliefs
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — iordanou-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.