Participants with evaluativist epistemic beliefs are more likely to write two-sided reports than those with absolutist or multiplist epistemic beliefs¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? A chi-square test of independence showed a significant relation between epistemic perspective (Evaluativists vs. Non-Evaluativists) and my-side bias (one-sided vs. two-sided report), χ2(1) = 4.508, p = .044. → Iordanou 2020
Evidence¶
Iordanou 2020¶
Iordanou, K., Kendeou, P., & Zembylas, M. (2020). Examining my-side bias during and after reading controversial historical accounts. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09240-w
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Chi-square test examining whether epistemic perspective and my-side bias in written summaries were independent. Nine participants were evaluativists; the remaining 30 were absolutist or multiplist. Evaluativists were more likely to produce two-sided reports.
"A chi-square test of independence showed a significant relation (χ2 (1) = 4.508, 4.059, p = .044). Participants holding evaluativist epistemic beliefs were more likely to write two-sided reports than participants holding absolutist or multiplist epistemic beliefs."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Epistemic Beliefs — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Epistemic beliefs, prior knowledge, and the think-aloud emotion of anger jointly predict low-epistemic processing during reading of the other-side text — related
- Four intermediate epistemic levels — late absolutist, early multiplist, late multiplist, and early evaluatist — emerged when students' forced-choice assumptions were triangulated with their written justifications — related
- Among students choosing multiplist and evaluatist assumptions, 11th-grade students were more likely than eighth-grade students to justify their views with pragmatic and evidential criteria of knowing — related
- Young adults exhibit my-side bias when writing summaries of contradictory historical accounts, with 72% producing one-sided reports despite explicit instructions to summarize both texts — related
- Preservice teachers with placements promoting successful constructivist science teaching were more likely to report evaluativist personal epistemologies — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
evaluativist-beliefs-two-sided-reports |
title |
Participants with evaluativist epistemic beliefs are more likely to write two-sided reports than those with absolutist or multiplist epistemic beliefs |
description |
Participants with evaluativist epistemic beliefs are more likely to write two-sided reports than those with absolutist or multiplist epistemic beliefs |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — iordanou-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.