Across everyday-mathematics studies, individuals tended to score higher on tasks linked to their everyday practices than on school-format versions of the same questions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? When the same questions were posed in everyday and school formats, individuals tended to score higher on tasks more closely linked to their everyday practices, though schooled people sometimes applied school knowledge to out-of-school problems. → Na'ilah Suad Nasir 2008
Evidence¶
Na'ilah Suad Nasir 2008¶
Na'ilah Suad Nasir, Victoria Hand and Edd V. Taylor. (2008). Culture and Mathematics in School: Boundaries between "Cultural" and "Domain" Knowledge in the Mathematics Classroom and Beyond. Review of Research in Education, Vol. 32. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X07308962
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports, citing studies of grocery shopping (Lave et al., 1984), dairy case work (Scribner), street vending in Brazil (Carraher et al.; Saxe), and basketball (Nasir), that individuals "tended to score higher on tasks more closely linked to their everyday practices." This is the review's narrative synthesis of second-hand studies, not a pooled estimate.
"Such studies have also found that when asked the same questions in an everyday and a school format, individuals tended to score higher on tasks more closely linked to their everyday practices, though schooled people do sometimes bring their school knowledge to bear to solve out-of-school problems."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Problem order produced an order effect: solving basketball problems first improved performance on all problems, while school problems first lowered performance
- Lave, Murtaugh, and de la Rocha found grocery shoppers nearly infallible at situated price-comparison mathematics but answering fewer than half of identical abstract paper-and-pencil problems correctly — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
everyday-practice-tasks-scored-higher-than-school-format |
title |
Across everyday-mathematics studies, individuals tended to score higher on tasks linked to their everyday practices than on school-format versions of the same questions |
description |
Across everyday-mathematics studies, individuals tended to score higher on tasks linked to their everyday practices than on school-format versions of the same questions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2008 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — nailah-suad-nasir-2008 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.