Claims

Least-to-most prompting and teaching wh-word meanings meet evidence-based criteria; explicit comprehension-strategy instruction is potentially evidence-based

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? According to Council for Exceptional Children criteria, least-to-most intrusive prompts (supported by 15 studies) and teaching the meaning of wh-words (supported by seven studies) can be identified as evidence-based, while explicit comprehension-strategy instruction (five studies, fewer than 20 participants) is potentially evidence-based. → Rachel Sermier Dessemontet 2024

Evidence

Rachel Sermier Dessemontet 2024

Rachel Sermier Dessemontet, Megan Geyer, Anne-Laure Linder, Myrto Atzemian, Catherine Martinet, Natalina Meuli, Catherine Audrin, Anne-Françoise de Chambrier. (2024). Effects of shared text reading for students with intellectual disability: A meta-analytical review of instructional strategies. Educational Research Review, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100615

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

The review's synthesis applying Council for Exceptional Children criteria (at least five methodologically sound single-case studies with positive effects and at least 20 participants) to the coded instructional strategies across the included studies.

"two instructional strategies can be identified as evidence based: (a) least to most intrusive prompts (including rereads and often reminders of the strategy taught) to help students answer comprehension questions (supported by 15 studies) and (b) teaching the meaning of wh-words (supported by seven studies). Teaching comprehension strategies explicitly can be considered potentially evidence based because it is supported by five methodologically sound studies with positive effects but encompassing fewer than 20 participants across studies."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id evidence-based-strategies-shared-reading-id
title Least-to-most prompting and teaching wh-word meanings meet evidence-based criteria; explicit comprehension-strategy instruction is potentially evidence-based
description Least-to-most prompting and teaching wh-word meanings meet evidence-based criteria; explicit comprehension-strategy instruction is potentially evidence-based
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — rachel-sermier-dessemontet-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.