Students who used EVS only for summative assessment reported lower learning benefits and higher challenges than students who used it formatively or in combination¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Learning benefits were significantly lower and challenges significantly higher in the summative-only group compared to the other two groups. → Marija Cubric 2015

Evidence¶

Marija Cubric 2015¶

Marija Cubric, and Amanda Jefferies. (2015). The benefits and challenges of large-scale deployment of electronic voting systems: University student views from across different subject groups. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.004

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Non-parametric comparison across three types of EVS use (non-summative, combination, summative-only) among 590 students. Mann-Whitney follow-up tests with Bonferroni correction confirmed summative-only use was associated with lower learning benefits and higher challenges.

"The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed that “learning benefits” and “challenges” (1st and 2nd component in Table 5) were both significantly affected by the type of use (Table 8) where H(2) =27.23, p< 0.001 and H(2)= 10.09, p<0.01 respectively."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Learning benefits and challenges of EVS differ significantly across subject groups, with HHS reporting higher learning benefits and SSAH reporting higher challenges — a broader claim this one bears on
• Summative assessment and staff competencies are the most frequently reported challenges in students' free-text responses about EVS dissatisfaction — a broader claim this one bears on
• As students' experience with EVS increases across academic years, learning benefits and classroom benefits increase while challenges decrease — related
• Students' perceptions of electronic voting systems cluster into four distinct dimensions: learning benefits, student-centered and technology-related challenges, ease of use, and classroom-related benefits — related