Claims

Eccentric viewing training significantly improved near visual acuity with participants' own eyeglasses

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Near visual acuity with current eyeglasses improved significantly within the eccentric viewing training group, though the pre-post difference between groups was not significant. → Leat et al. 2017

Evidence

Leat et al. 2017

Susan J. Leat, Francis Fengqin Si, Deborah Gold, Dawn Pickering, Keith Gordon, and William Hodge. (2017). The Experience of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Closed-Circuit Television Versus Eccentric Viewing Training for People with Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00971464

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Near reading acuity measured with the Lighthouse chart at baseline and outcome in the randomized trial. The discussion reports acuity remained reduced (logMAR 1.28, close to 20/400), so "some improvement may be obtained for low-acuity tasks such as dressing, grooming, and mobility."

"There was a significant improvement in near visual acuity (with current eyeglasses) within the eccentric viewing training group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.