Overall implementation of the EWIMS seven-step process was low and challenging in the first year, with all but two schools categorized as low implementers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2–r3·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? During the first full school year, 95 percent of EWIMS schools were categorized as low implementers across all seven steps. → Faria 2017
q2 i? Approximately 80 percent of EWIMS schools implemented EWIMS as planned, with one school never implementing and seven stopping during the year. → Faria 2017 (2)
Evidence¶
Faria 2017¶
Faria, A.-M., Sorensen, N., Heppen, J., Bowdon, J., Taylor, S., Eisner, R., & Foster, S. (2017). Getting students on track for graduation: Impacts of the Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System after one year (REL 2017–272). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Implementation analysis using a study-developed rubric applied to EWIMS schools' implementation data. "All but two EWIMS schools (95 percent) were categorized as low implementers" across all seven steps in 2014/15.
"During the first full school year of implementation (2014/15), all but two EWIMS schools (95 percent) were categorized as low implementers."
Faria 2017 (2)¶
Faria, A.-M., Sorensen, N., Heppen, J., Bowdon, J., Taylor, S., Eisner, R., & Foster, S. (2017). Getting students on track for graduation: Impacts of the Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System after one year (REL 2017–272). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Midwest. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
q2 · i? · causal · r3
Descriptive implementation analysis of the 37 EWIMS schools. "Approximately 80 percent of EWIMS schools implemented EWIMS as planned"; one school never implemented and seven stopped during the school year.
"Approximately 80 percent of EWIMS schools implemented EWIMS as planned in the 2014/15 school year."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- EWIMS reduced the percentage of students who were chronically absent after one year of implementation — related
- EWIMS did not reduce the percentage of students with low GPA on the binary indicator, though continuous GPA was higher in EWIMS schools — related
- EWIMS did not have a detectable impact on school data culture, though the overall scale effect size (Hedges' g = 0.27) favored EWIMS — related
- EWIMS schools were more likely than control schools to report using an early warning system and having a dedicated team, but did not differ in frequency of data review or interventions offered — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.