Within individuals, adopting the Exam Playbook tracks better subsequent exam performance and dropping it tracks worse¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3·i0negligible
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i0 Matched students who adopted the Exam Playbook on Exam 2 scored 1.75 percentage points higher (d = 0.12) than matched never-users. → Chen 2022
q3 i0 Matched students who dropped the Exam Playbook on Exam 2 scored 1.88 percentage points worse (d = 0.14) than matched continuing users. → Chen 2022 (2)
Evidence¶
Chen 2022¶
Chen, P., Teo, D. W. H., Foo, D. X. Y., Derry, H. A., Hayward, B. T., Schulz, K. W., Hayward, C., McKay, T. A., & Ong, D. C. (2022). Real-world effectiveness of a social-psychological intervention translated from controlled trials to classrooms. npj Science of Learning 7:20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00135-w
q3 · i0 · associational · r2
Stratified matching analysis (13 classes), matching on first-exam performance, entrance scores, gender, race, and first-generation status, found adopters "performed an average of 1.75 percentage points ([0.69, 2.81], d = 0.12, p = .001) better".
"students who adopted the Exam Playbook performed an average of 1.75 percentage points ([0.69, 2.81], d = 0.12, p = .001) better on the second exam, compared to those who never used it"
Chen 2022 (2)¶
Chen, P., Teo, D. W. H., Foo, D. X. Y., Derry, H. A., Hayward, B. T., Schulz, K. W., Hayward, C., McKay, T. A., & Ong, D. C. (2022). Real-world effectiveness of a social-psychological intervention translated from controlled trials to classrooms. npj Science of Learning 7:20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00135-w
q3 · i0 · associational · r2
In the parallel stratified matching analysis on first-exam users, droppers "performed an average of 1.88 percentage points ([0.64, 3.11], d = 0.14, p = .003) worse" than continuers.
"students who dropped the Exam Playbook performed an average of 1.88 percentage points ([0.64, 3.11], d = 0.14, p = .003) worse, compared to those who kept using it"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Self-administered Exam Playbook use predicts higher exam scores in real-world college classes (d = 0.18) — related
- Exam Playbook benefits relate to dosage and to earlier use before exams — related
- The instructor's own final exam showed the same direction of advantage on the intact randomized sample, with no difference on the pre-treatment midterm — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
exam-playbook-adopt-drop-intraindividual |
title |
Within individuals, adopting the Exam Playbook tracks better subsequent exam performance and dropping it tracks worse |
description |
Within individuals, adopting the Exam Playbook tracks better subsequent exam performance and dropping it tracks worse |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — chen-2022, chen-2022-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.