Claims

Within individuals, adopting the Exam Playbook tracks better subsequent exam performance and dropping it tracks worse

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 Matched students who adopted the Exam Playbook on Exam 2 scored 1.75 percentage points higher (d = 0.12) than matched never-users. → Chen 2022 q3 i0 Matched students who dropped the Exam Playbook on Exam 2 scored 1.88 percentage points worse (d = 0.14) than matched continuing users. → Chen 2022 (2)

Evidence

Chen 2022

Chen, P., Teo, D. W. H., Foo, D. X. Y., Derry, H. A., Hayward, B. T., Schulz, K. W., Hayward, C., McKay, T. A., & Ong, D. C. (2022). Real-world effectiveness of a social-psychological intervention translated from controlled trials to classrooms. npj Science of Learning 7:20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00135-w

q3 · i0 · associational · r2

Stratified matching analysis (13 classes), matching on first-exam performance, entrance scores, gender, race, and first-generation status, found adopters "performed an average of 1.75 percentage points ([0.69, 2.81], d = 0.12, p = .001) better".

"students who adopted the Exam Playbook performed an average of 1.75 percentage points ([0.69, 2.81], d = 0.12, p = .001) better on the second exam, compared to those who never used it"

Chen 2022 (2)

Chen, P., Teo, D. W. H., Foo, D. X. Y., Derry, H. A., Hayward, B. T., Schulz, K. W., Hayward, C., McKay, T. A., & Ong, D. C. (2022). Real-world effectiveness of a social-psychological intervention translated from controlled trials to classrooms. npj Science of Learning 7:20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00135-w

q3 · i0 · associational · r2

In the parallel stratified matching analysis on first-exam users, droppers "performed an average of 1.88 percentage points ([0.64, 3.11], d = 0.14, p = .003) worse" than continuers.

"students who dropped the Exam Playbook performed an average of 1.88 percentage points ([0.64, 3.11], d = 0.14, p = .003) worse, compared to those who kept using it"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id exam-playbook-adopt-drop-intraindividual
title Within individuals, adopting the Exam Playbook tracks better subsequent exam performance and dropping it tracks worse
description Within individuals, adopting the Exam Playbook tracks better subsequent exam performance and dropping it tracks worse
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — chen-2022, chen-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.