An example-based built-in course in a mobile chatbot journaling system increases students' intrinsic motivation for creating a learning journal¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 Students with access to the example-based course reported higher intrinsic motivation (enjoyment) for journaling than those without, a small significant effect. → Sven Scheu 2026
Evidence¶
Sven Scheu 2026¶
Sven Scheu, Simone N. Loeffler and Alexander Maedche. (2026). Designing a mobile chatbot-based learning journaling system for intrinsic motivation and engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-026-00589-7
q3 · i1 · causal · r2
Type-II ANOVA on IMI enjoyment scores among 157 active participants (those with at least 4 days of journal entries) in the 2×2 randomized field experiment. The course effect was small and significant, "thus confirming H1", with η² = 0.03. Results were similar when all participants were included (η² = 0.03, F(1, 175) = 5.96, p < 0.05).
"This revealed a small significant effect ( η2 =0 .03) of the course (F (1, 153) = 4 .81,p < 0.05), thus confirming H1."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Motivation — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Reflective Practice Improves Outcomes When Structured — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- The LLM-based journaling assistant shows no significant effect on students' intrinsic motivation for creating a learning journal — related
- Interest/enjoyment and perceived choice were the weakest motivation dimensions, suggesting Mangomon's RPG mechanics did not yet fully serve learner autonomy — related
- A first evaluation of 3B confirms its conformance to critical usability requirements including safety and comfort, believability, simplicity, acceptability, extensibility, affordability, and mobility — related
- The example-based course increased perceived competence, but neither the course nor the assistant had a significant effect on perceived choice or pressure — related
- Question-driven AI journaling increases intrinsic motivation and acting confidence among actors — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
example-based-course-increases-journaling-intrinsic-motivation |
title |
An example-based built-in course in a mobile chatbot journaling system increases students' intrinsic motivation for creating a learning journal |
description |
An example-based built-in course in a mobile chatbot journaling system increases students' intrinsic motivation for creating a learning journal |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sven-scheu-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.