Lesson variability benefits transfer only in combination with worked-example instruction, as shown by a variability-by-instruction interaction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2000 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In teaching geometry to secondary technical school students, students in worked-example conditions benefited more from lesson variability than students in practice conditions, alongside a main effect for example-based instruction. → Atkinson 2000
Evidence¶
Atkinson 2000¶
Atkinson, R. K., Derry, S. J., Renkl, A., & Wortham, D. (2000). Learning from Examples: Instructional Principles from the Worked Examples Research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181-214. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002181
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports, citing Paas and Van Merrienboer, a four-group experiment (low/high variability by practice/example) with secondary technical school students learning geometry, assessed by a six-item transfer posttest; the review reports 'an interaction' favoring worked-example conditions.
"Consistent with their prediction, they also found an interaction: Students in the worked-example condition benefited more from lesson variability than students in the practice condition."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
-
Encoding variability across varied example contexts produces decontextualization supporting transfer (review reports DiVesta and Peverly) — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
Comparing cases side by side improves learning and transfer by a moderate average amount, though in one algebra study it raised procedural knowledge and flexibility but not conceptual knowledge — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
Split-attention worked examples lose their advantage over conventional practice, while integrated formats restore it — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Invention Tasks Prepare Future Learning — related
- Segmentation Benefits Shrink With Expertise — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
example-variability-interaction-with-cognitive-load |
title |
Lesson variability benefits transfer only in combination with worked-example instruction, as shown by a variability-by-instruction interaction |
description |
Lesson variability benefits transfer only in combination with worked-example instruction, as shown by a variability-by-instruction interaction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2000 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-13 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — atkinson-2000 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.