Individual studies excluded from meta-analysis mostly showed no significant between-group differences, with single exceptions favouring the workshop for practical skills and online for satisfaction¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesis r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the workshop contrast, one study precluded from meta-analysis found a statistically significant effect in favour of the workshop for practical skills. → Richmond Helen 2017 q2 i? In the lecture contrast, one study precluded from meta-analysis found satisfaction significantly favoured the online group. → Richmond Helen 2017 (2)

Evidence¶

Richmond Helen 2017¶

Richmond Helen, Copsey Bethan, Hall Amanda M., Davies David, Lamb Sarah E. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of online versus alternative methods for training licensed health care professionals to deliver clinical interventions. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1047-4

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Narrative report of individual workshop-contrast studies whose data could not be pooled. The review reports no significant between-group differences except one study finding a significant effect "in favour of the workshop for practical skills"; no effect size is printed.

"Results from individual studies precluded from the meta-analyses showed no significant between group differences for any of their outcomes (knowledge, practical skills and satisfaction), with the exception of a single study [25], who found a statistically significant effect in favour of the workshop for practical skills."

Richmond Helen 2017 (2)¶

Richmond Helen, Copsey Bethan, Hall Amanda M., Davies David, Lamb Sarah E. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of online versus alternative methods for training licensed health care professionals to deliver clinical interventions. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-1047-4

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Narrative report of individual lecture-contrast studies whose data could not be pooled. The review reports no significant differences except one study where satisfaction "favoured the online group"; no effect size is printed.

"Results from individual studies precluded from the meta-analyses showed no significant between group differences for any of their outcomes (knowledge, practical skills, and satisfaction) with the exception of satisfaction in a single study [23], which favoured the online group."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Online training shows no difference from interactive workshops for knowledge, practical skills, clinical behaviour, self-efficacy, or satisfaction in licensed health professionals, at low or very low evidence quality — related