Claims

The existing Science and Technology curriculum produced no significant pre-to-post change in 6th graders' problem solving skills test scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Control group students' pre-test and post-test problem solving skills scores did not differ significantly after five weeks of the existing curriculum. → Koc Akran 2019

Evidence

Koc Akran 2019

Koc Akran, S., & Gurbuzturk, O. (2019). Effect of layered curriculum in problem solving skills of students in science and technology course. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(1), 135-150. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.1.147

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test paired control group study; t-test on the researcher-developed Problem Solving Skills Test for the 30-student control group. Means rose from "74,90" to "75,88" but the difference was not significant; equivalence was not tested.

"pre-test problem solving skills point average of the control group is = 74,90 out of 100 points, and post-test problem solving skills is = 75,88; but significant differentiation was not observed between pre-test and post-test point averages [t(29)= 1,424; p>0.05]"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.