Claims

In Experiment 1, diagnosis scores were better for the liver cirrhosis case than the pheochromocytoma case, but not among experts

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 1995 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The liver cirrhosis case yielded better diagnosis scores than pheochromocytoma overall, with an expertise × case interaction. → Boshuizen 1995

Evidence

Boshuizen 1995

Boshuizen, H. P. A., Schmidt, H. G., Custers, E. J. F. M., & van de Wiel, M. W. (1995). Knowledge Development and Restructuring in the Domain of Medicine: The Role of Theory and Practice. Learning and Instruction. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/learning-and-instruction

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Secondary case-difficulty analysis within Experiment 1, comparing the two clinical cases on scored diagnoses; the article prints the main effect and the interaction with expertise level.

"Diagnosis scores were better for the liver cirrhosis cast than for the pheochromocytoma cast (F( 1, 84)=39.116; p=O.OOOl), though this was not the same with the experts (interaction f(3, X4)=8.450; p=O.OOOl)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id exp1-case-difficulty-liver-cirrhosis
title In Experiment 1, diagnosis scores were better for the liver cirrhosis case than the pheochromocytoma case, but not among experts
description In Experiment 1, diagnosis scores were better for the liver cirrhosis case than the pheochromocytoma case, but not among experts
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1995
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — boshuizen-1995

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.