Claims

Testing after studying four worked examples does not enhance delayed test performance compared with restudy among vocational education students in probability calculation (Experiment 4)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-10-21 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 In Experiment 4, there was no significant difference between restudy (M=38.43%) and test (M=50.00%) conditions in final test performance, despite a printed d=0.341. → Tamara van Gog & Liesbeth Kester & Kim Dirkx & Vincent Hoogerheide & Joris Boerboom & Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen 2015

Evidence

Tamara van Gog & Liesbeth Kester & Kim Dirkx & Vincent Hoogerheide & Joris Boerboom & Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen 2015

Tamara van Gog & Liesbeth Kester & Kim Dirkx & Vincent Hoogerheide & Joris Boerboom & Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen. (2015). Testing After Worked Example Study Does Not Enhance Delayed Problem-Solving Performance Compared to Restudy. Educ Psychol Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9297-3

q2 · i1 · causal · r2

Experiment 4, a randomized two-condition experiment with 75 vocational education students (57 analyzed) learning probability calculation from video worked examples. The t-test showed "no significant difference between the restudy (M=38 .43 %, SD=32.32) and test ( M=50.00 %, SD=35.51) condition", t(55)=1.282, p=0.205, Cohen's d=0.341; equivalence was not tested.

"There was no significant difference between the restudy (M=38 .43 %, SD=32.32) and test ( M=50.00 %, SD=35.51) condition in final test performance, t(55)= 1.282, p=0.20 5, Cohen’s d=0.34 1"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id exp4-no-testing-effect-vocational-probability
title Testing after studying four worked examples does not enhance delayed test performance compared with restudy among vocational education students in probability calculation (Experiment 4)
description Testing after studying four worked examples does not enhance delayed test performance compared with restudy among vocational education students in probability calculation (Experiment 4)
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
source_checked 2026-10-21
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tamara-van-gog-liesbeth-kester-kim-dirkx-vincent-hoogerheide-joris-boerboom-peter-p-j-l-verkoeijen-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.