Claims

Expectancies for success predict academic achievement more strongly than task values

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r3 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Expectancies for success show moderate meta-analytic correlations with current (r = .34) and future (r = .41) academic achievement. → Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia 2023

Evidence

Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia 2023

Detlef Urhahne · Lisette Wijnia. (2023). Theories of Motivation in Education: an Integrative Framework. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9

q3 · i2 · theoretical · r3

Meta-analysis of expectancies for success reported in the expectancy-value section. It found a "moderate association of expectancies for success" with current achievement r = .34 and future achievement r = .41.

"A meta-analysis by Pinquart and Ebeling (2020) found a moderate association of expectancies for success with both current (r = .34) and future academic achievement (r = .41)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id expectancy-success-predicts-achievement
title Expectancies for success predict academic achievement more strongly than task values
description Expectancies for success predict academic achievement more strongly than task values
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — detlef-urhahne-lisette-wijnia-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.