Claims

Surgeons' previous experience and participation in structured training programmes are associated with shorter robot-assisted learning curves

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In three of five studies comparing operating-time learning curves of robotic surgeons, those with greater experience required fewer procedures to overcome their learning curve. → Soomro N. A. 2020 q2 i? In one small study, three surgeons who had participated in an institutional training programme overcame the learning curve for robot-assisted colorectal resection in 25–30 procedures each, versus 74 procedures for an earlier surgeon who joined before the programme was established. → Soomro N. A. 2020 (2)

Evidence

Soomro N. A. 2020

Soomro N. A., Hashimoto D. A., Porteous A. J., Ridley C. J. A., Marsh W. J., Ditto R. and Roy S. (2020). Systematic review of learning curves in robot‐assisted surgery. BJS Open. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50235

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's discussion of moderators, synthesizing five studies comparing operating-time learning curves by prior experience. The review notes studies generally did not report participants' specific grade or training experience, limiting interpretation.

"in three of five studies comparing the operating time learning curves of robotic surgeons, those with greater experience required fewer procedures to overcome their learning curve16, 29, 38."

Soomro N. A. 2020 (2)

Soomro N. A., Hashimoto D. A., Porteous A. J., Ridley C. J. A., Marsh W. J., Ditto R. and Roy S. (2020). Systematic review of learning curves in robot‐assisted surgery. BJS Open. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50235

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review attributes this finding to Guend and colleagues, describing it as based on a small sample size. The review notes few studies provided details of their training programmes, and mentions recent programmes using feedback loops to shorten time to adequate performance.

"Guend and colleagues27 reported that a lower procedure volume was required to overcome the learning curve for robot‐assisted colorectal resections for three surgeons who had participated in an institutional training programme (25–30 procedures each), compared with the volume required for an earlier surgeon who joined the institution before the programme was established (74 procedures)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.