Claims

Experiential learning-based Mathematics teaching material improves fifth-graders' Mathematics cognitive ability more than conventional teaching material

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Fifth-grade students using experiential learning-based Mathematics teaching material achieved higher posttest cognitive ability scores than control students using conventional material (independent t-test significance 0.000, t count 6.321). → Mutmainah 2019

Evidence

Mutmainah 2019

Mutmainah, Rukayah, Mintasih Indriayu. (2019). Effectiveness of experiential learning-based teaching material in Mathematics. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), Vol. 8, No. 1, March 2019, pp. 57-63. http://iaescore.com/journals/index.php/IJERE

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental matching-only pretest-posttest control group study in two Gunungpati elementary schools; N-gain prerequisite tests passed, then an independent sample t-test on N-gain gave t count 6.321 with significance "0.000", so H0 was rejected.

"The result of independent sample t-test obtained the significance level of 0.000 (Sig. > 0.05), so it can be concluded that H0 is rejected which states that there is no different score between the experimental and control group after being given the different treatment."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.