Instruction increased students' ability to evaluate experiments designed by others on a paper-and-pencil test¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2000 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Mean experiment evaluation scores rose from 61% correct before instruction to 87% after, and consistently good evaluators increased from 28% to 76%. → Eva Erdosne Toth 2000
Evidence¶
Eva Erdosne Toth 2000¶
Eva Erdosne Toth, David Klahr, and Zhe Chen. (2000). Bridging Research and Practice: A Cognitively Based Classroom Intervention for Teaching Experimentation Skills to Elementary School Children. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 423–459. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1804_1
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Pre/post paper-and-pencil experiment evaluation test (10 airplane-comparison items) administered to all students in the classroom study; means rose from 61% to 87%, t(70) = 8.72, p < .0001.
"Mean experiment evaluation scores increased from 61% correct prior to instruction to 87% correct after instruction,t(70) = 8.72,p < .0001."
Eva Erdosne Toth 2000 (2)¶
Eva Erdosne Toth, David Klahr, and Zhe Chen. (2000). Bridging Research and Practice: A Cognitively Based Classroom Intervention for Teaching Experimentation Skills to Elementary School Children. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 423–459. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1804_1
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Same evaluation test, consistency analysis (N = 74): students correct on at least 9 of 10 comparisons rose from 28% to 76%, χ2(1, N = 74) = 31.2, p = .001.
"The percentage of students who were consistently good evaluators of experiments designed by others, that is, those who could evaluate correctly at least 9 of the 10 comparisons,increased from 28% prior to instruction to 76% after instruction, χ2(1, N = 74) = 31.2, p = .001."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Critical Thinking — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Students' experiment-evaluation strategies shifted toward correct CVS after instruction, though 23% still used incorrect strategies — related
- Group CVS performance on classroom worksheets rose after instruction, and experimentation alone without instruction produced no significant gain — related
- Classroom expository CVS instruction dramatically increased fourth graders' CVS performance in individual hands-on interviews — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
experiment-evaluation-gains |
title |
Instruction increased students' ability to evaluate experiments designed by others on a paper-and-pencil test |
description |
Instruction increased students' ability to evaluate experiments designed by others on a paper-and-pencil test |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2000 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — eva-erdosne-toth-2000, eva-erdosne-toth-2000-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.