Claims

Experimental-group females significantly outperformed both control-group subgroups in post-hoc comparisons

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-hoc tests showed females in the experimental group scored significantly higher than both the control males and control females subgroups. → Ghaedrahmat 2016

Evidence

Ghaedrahmat 2016

Ghaedrahmat, M., Alavi Nia, P. & Biria, R. (2016). The Effect of Explicit Vs. Implicit Instruction on Mastering the Speech Act of Thanking among Iranian Male and Female EFL Learners. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 9(2), 401-425. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2016.9.2.7

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Post-hoc multiple comparisons on the ANOVA of the 30 learners' posttest DCT scores. Experimental females vs control males: mean difference 21.58929, Sig. = .004; experimental females vs control females: mean difference 26.25000, Sig. = .001. No effect size is printed.

"it is not the males in the experimental group that performed better than all other subgroups; however, females in experimental group ranked the second and outper- formed both sub groups of control group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.