Claims

After the goal-oriented program, a higher percentage of experimental-group students had no academic debt and a lower percentage had constant academic debt compared with the test group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 45% of the experimental group (28 of 63 students) had no academic debt versus 33% of the test group (14 of 42), and 22% versus 36% constantly had academic debt. → Zeleeva et al. 2016

Evidence

Zeleeva et al. 2016

Vera P. Zeleeva, Svetlana S. Bykova, Silvia Varbanova. (2016). Psychological and Pedagogical Support for Students' Adaptation to Learning Activity in High Science School. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(3), 151-161. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1092226

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Group-division results in Table 1 (2013/2014): test group 42 students, experimental group 63 students. In the experimental group 28 students (45%) "don't have academic debt" versus 14 (33%) in the test group; 14 (22%) versus 15 (36%) constantly had debt.

"Consequently the experimental group showed the higher percent of students not having academic debt in comparison with a test group; less percent of students having academic debt after the goal -oriented program implementation has been proved as well."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.