Pupils in experimental groups showed larger gains in research-skill development levels than control-group pupils, moving to a new level in 80% (successfulness) and 75% (mastery) versus 30% and 32% in the control group¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Movement to a new development level was revealed in 80% of pupils in experimental groups according to the successfulness index and 75% according to the mastery index, while control-group indices showed no considerable changes (30% successfulness, 32% mastery). → Sabirova 2016

Evidence¶

Sabirova 2016¶

Sabirova, E. G., Zakirova, V. G. & Masalimova, A. R. (2016). Development of Junior Pupils Research Skills in Interrelation with Universal Learning Activities. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(4), 505-514. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1094583

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental comparison of one control and two experimental groups of junior pupils in Kazan schools, using diagnostic measurements of research skills. The article reports level movement in "80% of pupils" on successfulness and 75% on mastery in experimental groups; control indices were 30% and 32% with no considerable changes.

"Movement to the new level (from low to intermediate, and from intermediate to higher level) according to successfulness index was revealed in 80% of pupils, and according to mastery index it was revealed in 75% of pupils in experimental groups."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The largest experimental–control difference appeared at the specific transfer level — related
• Both groups improved from pretest to posttest at the individual level, with the article attributing the experimental group's larger gains to the etudes — related