Claims

Experts from multiple world regions affirmed the need and value of academic integrity indicators but queried prospects for dissemination and adoption

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2030: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Qualitative consultation with experts across European, African, Middle Eastern, Eurasian, Asian and North/South American systems affirmed the indicators' need and value while querying dissemination and adoption prospects. → Hamish Coates 2025

Evidence

Hamish Coates 2025

Hamish Coates, Gwilym Croucher, Angel Calderon. (2025). Governing Academic Integrity: Ensuring the Authenticity of Higher Thinking in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-025-09639-7

q2 · i? · design · r2

Qualitative consultation in which 130 items were built into a website data collection and reporting tool, distributed during 2022 and 2023 to 60 experts, with online feedback received from 56 and in-depth follow-up interviews conducted with nine. Experts "affirmed the need and value of the indicators".

"Overall, the experts affirmed the need and value of the indicators but queried the potential in a competitive information space hence prospects for dissemination and adoption."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id experts-affirm-indicator-value-query-adoption
title Experts from multiple world regions affirmed the need and value of academic integrity indicators but queried prospects for dissemination and adoption
description Experts from multiple world regions affirmed the need and value of academic integrity indicators but queried prospects for dissemination and adoption
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
recheck_by 2030
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — hamish-coates-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.