Claims

Providing explanations during a small-group discussion yields better recall of subsequently studied text one month later than only listening to the discussion

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Participants who explained during a relevant simulated discussion recalled more text propositions one month later than participants who only listened (r = 0.31). → Floris M. van Blankenstein 2011

Evidence

Floris M. van Blankenstein 2011

Floris M. van Blankenstein, Diana H. J. M. Dolmans, Cees P. M. van der Vleuten, Henk G. Schmidt. (2011). Which cognitive processes support learning during small-group discussion? The role of providing explanations and listening to others. Instructional Science 39, 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9124-7

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Randomized experiment with 70 Maastricht University students assigned to explanation (N = 24), listening (N = 24) or control (N = 22) conditions using a video-recorded simulated discussion. The planned contrast found explainers recalled more than listeners at one month, "t(67) = 2.22, p\ .05 (two-tailed), r = 0.31".

"In contrast, participants who had explained during the discussion 1 month before recalled more than the participants who had listened, t(67) = 2.22, p\ .05 (two-tailed), r = 0.31."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id explaining-during-discussion-improves-delayed-recall
title Providing explanations during a small-group discussion yields better recall of subsequently studied text one month later than only listening to the discussion
description Providing explanations during a small-group discussion yields better recall of subsequently studied text one month later than only listening to the discussion
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2011
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — floris-m-van-blankenstein-2011

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.