Claims

Explanation prompts direct attention to targeted information and can reduce attention to other important information

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 3 of 3 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Why-prompts supported more detailed explanations of domain principles but decreased the number of calculations performed during learning. → Bethany Rittle-Johnson & Abbey M. Loehr 2017 q2 i? Prompts focused on solution procedures reduced comprehension relative to studying examples without generating explanations. → Bethany Rittle-Johnson & Abbey M. Loehr 2017 (2) q2 i? In the only direct prompt-type contrast identified, how-explanation prompts led to greater procedural transfer than why-explanation prompts. → Bethany Rittle-Johnson & Abbey M. Loehr 2017 (3)

Evidence

Bethany Rittle-Johnson & Abbey M. Loehr 2017

Bethany Rittle-Johnson & Abbey M. Loehr. (2017). Eliciting explanations: Constraints on when self-explanation aids learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1501–1510. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1079-5

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports Berthold et al. (2011), where college students studied a tax-law e-learning module with why-explanation prompts or unguided note taking. Why-prompts yielded more elaborations on domain principles but "decreased the number of calculations performed during learning."

"However, the prompts also decreased the number of calculations performed during learning (Berthold et al., 2011)."

Bethany Rittle-Johnson & Abbey M. Loehr 2017 (2)

Bethany Rittle-Johnson & Abbey M. Loehr. (2017). Eliciting explanations: Constraints on when self-explanation aids learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1501–1510. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1079-5

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports Große & Renkl (2006): prompts focused on solution procedures "reduced comprehension relative to studying the examples without generating explanations," illustrating the hidden cost of misdirected attention.

"In contrast, prompts that focused attention on solution procedures (e.g., BWhere do you see commonalities and differences between the two solution methods? ^) reduced comprehension relative to studying the examples without generating explanations (Große & Renkl,2006)."

Bethany Rittle-Johnson & Abbey M. Loehr 2017 (3)

Bethany Rittle-Johnson & Abbey M. Loehr. (2017). Eliciting explanations: Constraints on when self-explanation aids learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 1501–1510. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1079-5

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports Nokes et al. (2011), high-school students explaining worked physics examples with how- or why-prompts. How-prompts produced greater procedural transfer; the authors argued these prompts better matched the target content. Conceptual knowledge was not assessed.

"The how-explanation prompts led to greater procedural transfer than the why-explanation prompts (conceptual knowledge was not assessed)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id explanation-prompts-redirect-attention-with-hidden-costs
title Explanation prompts direct attention to targeted information and can reduce attention to other important information
description Explanation prompts direct attention to targeted information and can reduce attention to other important information
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — bethany-rittle-johnson-abbey-m-loehr-2017, bethany-rittle-johnson-abbey-m-loehr-2017-2, bethany-rittle-johnson-abbey-m-loehr-2017-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.