Number of retrieval exposures moderates the expanding-versus-uniform schedule benefit: more tests favour the expanding schedule¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q4
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q4 i? In subset 2, the number of exposures of an item during retrieval practice explains inconsistencies between studies: the more learners are tested, the more beneficial the expanding schedule is compared with the uniform one. → Latimier 2021
Evidence¶
Latimier 2021¶
Latimier, A., Peyre, H., & Ramus, F. (2021). A Meta-Analytic Review of the Benefit of Spacing out Retrieval Practice Episodes on Retention. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09572-8
q4 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Moderator meta-regression on subset 2 (54 effect sizes comparing expanding and uniform schedules). The review reports that "the number of exposures of an item during retrieval practice explains inconsistencies between studies", with more testing favouring the expanding schedule.
"Moderator analyses on this subset showed that the number of exposures of an item during retrieval practice explains inconsistencies between studies: the more learners are tested, the more beneficial the expanding schedule is compared with the uniform one."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Total retrieval spacing improved one-week vocabulary recall while relative schedules were not distinguished — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Expanding and uniform spacing schedules of retrieval practice do not differ significantly in final retention (g = 0.034) — related
- Spaced Retrieval Improves Retention — related
- Uniform two-week spacing between distillations yielded the greatest benefit among the tested schedules, ranking Standard, Mixed, Frontloaded, then Baseline — related
- Expanding retrieval schedules have not shown consistent advantages over equally spaced or contracting schedules matched on total spacing — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
exposures-moderate-expanding-schedule-benefit |
title |
Number of retrieval exposures moderates the expanding-versus-uniform schedule benefit: more tests favour the expanding schedule |
description |
Number of retrieval exposures moderates the expanding-versus-uniform schedule benefit: more tests favour the expanding schedule |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-13 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — latimier-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.