Claims

Negative expressivity levels and trajectories did not significantly predict first-grade applied problems (mathematics) scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In supplementary analyses, neither negative expressivity levels nor trajectories significantly predicted G1 applied problems scores. → Hernández 2018

Evidence

Hernández 2018

Hernández, M. M., Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., Thompson, M. S., Spinrad, T. L., Grimm, K. J., VanSchyndel, S. K., Berger, R. H., Silva, K. M., Pina, A. A., Southworth, J., & Gal, D. E. (2018). Trajectories of the Expression of Negative Emotion from Kindergarten to First Grade: Associations with Academic Outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000213

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Supplementary analysis reported in the limitations section: a standardized mathematics measure (applied problems) was examined and neither levels nor trajectories of negative expressivity significantly predicted G1 scores. No test statistics were printed.

"In supplementary analyses, we examined a standardized mathematics measure (i.e., applied problems) and the results were not significant; that is, negative emotional expressivity levels and trajectories both did not significantly predict applied problem scores in G1"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.