External strategy use affects comprehension of relations among controversial texts, according to the article's title statement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q1
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The article reports effects of external strategy use on comprehension of relations among controversial texts. → Kobayashi 2009
Evidence¶
Kobayashi 2009¶
Kobayashi, Keiichi. (2009). Comprehension of relations among controversial texts: effects of external strategy use. Instructional Science, 37(4), 311-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9041-6
q1 · i? · causal · r?
The repository record for this Instructional Science journal article (published 2009-07, volume 37, issue 4, pages 311-324) states in its title that the study examined "effects of external strategy use" on comprehension of relations among controversial texts. The full article text was not supplied, so no further findings, sample details, or statistics can be reported.
"Comprehension of relations among controversial texts: effects of external strategy use"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Cognitive processing differs by text type: participants engaged in more epistemic processing, meta-comprehension, and coherence-based processing when reading the other-side text than the own-side text — related
- Young adults exhibit my-side bias when writing summaries of contradictory historical accounts, with 72% producing one-sided reports despite explicit instructions to summarize both texts — related
- External validity of the special-issue strategy measures was mixed: low-to-moderate comprehension correlations for Bräten and Strømsø and Magliano et al., indeterminate for Schellings and Winne and Muis — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
external-strategy-use-comprehension-controversial-texts |
title |
External strategy use affects comprehension of relations among controversial texts, according to the article's title statement |
description |
External strategy use affects comprehension of relations among controversial texts, according to the article's title statement |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2009 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kobayashi-2009 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.