Claims

Undergraduate students taught SQL face-to-face performed significantly higher on the SQL Final Test than students taught with a blended learning method over a two-week experiment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 Students in the F2F learning environment performed significantly higher than students in the blended learning environment on the SQL Final Test (Mann-Whitney U=242.0, z=-2.813, r=.36). → Yavuzarslan 2019

Evidence

Yavuzarslan 2019

Yavuzarslan, M., Olgun, H., & Yazici, S. (2019). A Pilot Study on the Comparison Between Blended and F2F Learning Methods in a SQL Course. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED602380

q2 · i2 · causal · r2

Randomized experimental comparison of 61 undergraduates: blended group (n=22) using a Google Course Builder SQL course plus 20 minutes of F2F lecturing per lesson, control group (n=39) taught by verbal lecturing. Mann-Whitney U test favored the control group; the article reports "r=.36". The text prints "p>.05" while Table 6 prints p=.005.

"It can be seen from Table 6 that a statistically significant difference was found between the mean scores of control (Md=62.5, n=39) and experimental groups (Md=30.0, n=22) in favor of the control group (U=242.0, z=-2.813, p>.05, r=.36)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.