Claims

Review-attributed evidence: fabricated model-generated references clustered in disciplinary journals in a student verification exercise

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a classroom verification exercise reported by Sevryugina and Vargas, 51.3% of 456 model-generated references checked by students proved real and correctly cited, with fabricated ones clustered in disciplinary journals. → Muminova 2026

Evidence

Muminova 2026

Muminova, Z. O., Mamatkulov, D. M., Turokulova, R. I., Rakhmonova, N. T., Shavqiyev, O. S. O., & Zoirova, S. U. (2026). The nature of science in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Epistemic authority, materiality, and a synergetic response. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 22(10), em2943. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/19481

q2 · i? · theoretical · r3

The review reports this classroom verification exercise, citing Sevryugina and Vargas (2026); the study's own design is not described beyond the quoted sentence. It is used as illustrative evidence that fabricated content is not an occasional accident and that assertiveness is weakly coupled to accuracy.

"In a classroom verification exercise in which students checked 456 model-generated references against the literature, 51.3% of those references proved to be real and correctly cited, and the fabricated ones clustered in disciplinary journals rather than in high-profile multidisciplinary ones"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id fabricated-references-cluster-disciplinary-journals
title Review-attributed evidence: fabricated model-generated references clustered in disciplinary journals in a student verification exercise
description Review-attributed evidence: fabricated model-generated references clustered in disciplinary journals in a student verification exercise
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
source_checked 2026-10-20
recheck_by 2029
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — muminova-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.