FACTs benefit lower-performing students most: significant gains for Passed and Passed-very-well students but not for Passed-with-distinction students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr1–r2·q1–q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In the experimental group, pre-to-post gains were significant for students assessed Passed (p=.007) and Passed very well (p=.042), but not for Passed with distinction (p=.463). → Mária Ganajová 2021
q2 i? The authors conclude teaching with FACTs stimulated learning mainly in lower-performing students, consistent with Black and Wiliam's finding that lower achievers benefit most from FA. → Mária Ganajová 2021 (2)
Evidence¶
Mária Ganajová 2021¶
Mária Ganajová, Ivana Sotáková, Stanislav Lukáč, Zuzana Ješková, Veronika Jurková, Renáta Orosová. (2021). Formative Assessment as a Tool to Enhance the Development of Inquiry Skills in Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 20, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.204
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Paired t-tests within the experimental group by overall end-of-term assessment: P mean difference .114 (p=.007), PW .071 (p=.042), PD .020 (p=.463); hypothesis H4 confirmed.
"A statistically significant difference in the inquiry skill level between the pre-test and post-test was identified in average students (P) (p=.007; p<α) and very good students (PW) (p=.042; p<α). However, in excellent students (PD), the difference in the inquiry skill level between the pre-test and post-test was not statistically significant."
Mária Ganajová 2021 (2)¶
Mária Ganajová, Ivana Sotáková, Stanislav Lukáč, Zuzana Ješková, Veronika Jurková, Renáta Orosová. (2021). Formative Assessment as a Tool to Enhance the Development of Inquiry Skills in Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 20, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.204
q1 · i? · causal · r2
Authors' conclusion interpreting the assessment-group results; they link it to PISA 2018 data on low-performing Slovak students and to prior FA research on confidence and motivation.
"Moreover, it was found that teaching using FACTs stimulated learning mainly in the lower performing students, in this case, the highest efficacy in terms of inquiry skill development could be observed."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.