Claims

FACTs benefit lower-performing students most: significant gains for Passed and Passed-very-well students but not for Passed-with-distinction students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1–r2 · q1–q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the experimental group, pre-to-post gains were significant for students assessed Passed (p=.007) and Passed very well (p=.042), but not for Passed with distinction (p=.463). → Mária Ganajová 2021 q2 i? The authors conclude teaching with FACTs stimulated learning mainly in lower-performing students, consistent with Black and Wiliam's finding that lower achievers benefit most from FA. → Mária Ganajová 2021 (2)

Evidence

Mária Ganajová 2021

Mária Ganajová, Ivana Sotáková, Stanislav Lukáč, Zuzana Ješková, Veronika Jurková, Renáta Orosová. (2021). Formative Assessment as a Tool to Enhance the Development of Inquiry Skills in Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 20, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.204

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Paired t-tests within the experimental group by overall end-of-term assessment: P mean difference .114 (p=.007), PW .071 (p=.042), PD .020 (p=.463); hypothesis H4 confirmed.

"A statistically significant difference in the inquiry skill level between the pre-test and post-test was identified in average students (P) (p=.007; p<α) and very good students (PW) (p=.042; p<α). However, in excellent students (PD), the difference in the inquiry skill level between the pre-test and post-test was not statistically significant."

Mária Ganajová 2021 (2)

Mária Ganajová, Ivana Sotáková, Stanislav Lukáč, Zuzana Ješková, Veronika Jurková, Renáta Orosová. (2021). Formative Assessment as a Tool to Enhance the Development of Inquiry Skills in Science Education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, Vol. 20, No. 2. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/21.20.204

q1 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' conclusion interpreting the assessment-group results; they link it to PISA 2018 data on low-performing Slovak students and to prior FA research on confidence and motivation.

"Moreover, it was found that teaching using FACTs stimulated learning mainly in the lower performing students, in this case, the highest efficacy in terms of inquiry skill development could be observed."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.