Claims

Most U.S. higher education faculty believe OER are a good idea but few actually use them

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Although most U.S. higher education faculty believe OER are a good idea, only 14% use them in any way, and only 8% of those aware of institutional initiatives commit to using OER in the next three years. → Kimmons 2021

Evidence

Kimmons 2021

Kimmons, R. (2021). Shifting to open education in our digital learning. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09949-8

q2 · i? · theoretical · r2

The editorial cites survey research by Spilovoy et al. (2020) on faculty selection of classroom materials, reporting that "only 14% actually use them in any way" despite favorable beliefs. No effect size is printed.

"even though most higher education faculty in my country (the U.S.) believe that open educational resources (OER) are a good idea, only 14% actually use them in any way, and only 8% of those aware of focused initiatives at their institutions will commit to using OER in the next three years (Spilovoy et al. 2020)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id faculty-believe-oer-but-few-use-them
title Most U.S. higher education faculty believe OER are a good idea but few actually use them
description Most U.S.
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kimmons-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.