Claims

The position of faded worked solution steps did not influence learning outcomes in Experiment 1

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2004 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the first experiment, the position of the faded steps did not influence learning outcomes. → Renkl 2004

Evidence

Renkl 2004

Renkl, A., Atkinson, R.K. & Große, C.S. (2004). How Fading Worked Solution Steps Works – A Cognitive Load Perspective. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021815.74806.f6

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Experiment 1 in a computer-based learning environment containing faded worked solution steps found that "the position of the faded steps did notinfluence learning outcomes". The abstract reports no test statistic or effect size for this null finding.

"The first experiment showed thatthe position of the faded steps did notinfluence learning outcomes; instead,individuals learned most about those principlesthat were faded."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id faded-step-position-no-learning-outcome-effect
title The position of faded worked solution steps did not influence learning outcomes in Experiment 1
description The position of faded worked solution steps did not influence learning outcomes in Experiment 1
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2004
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-13
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — renkl-2004

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.