Claims

Among undergraduates who fell into a fallacy trap, false analogy was the most common and slippery slope the least common

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among those who fell into the fallacy trap, the ordering was false analogy, then post hoc, ad hominem, hasty generalization and slippery slope. → Ramasamy 2011

Evidence

Ramasamy 2011

Ramasamy, S. (2011). An Analysis of Informal Reasoning Fallacy and Critical Thinking Dispositions among Malaysian Undergraduates. Asia e University. https://www.aeu.edu.my

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Discussion of the Table 2 scoring distribution, where 0 points indicates falling into the fallacy trap. False Analogy had the largest 0-point share (19.4%) and Slippery Slope the smallest (10.6%) among the 189 respondents.

"However, among those who fell into the fallacy trap, most students seem to slide into the false analogy fallacy followed by post hoc, ad hominem, hasty generalization and slippery slope respectively."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id false-analogy-most-common-fallacy-trap
title Among undergraduates who fell into a fallacy trap, false analogy was the most common and slippery slope the least common
description Among undergraduates who fell into a fallacy trap, false analogy was the most common and slippery slope the least common
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2011
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ramasamy-2011

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.