During the final fatigue test, time per problem rose gradually, then markedly, with no obvious correlation between time and accuracy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 1914 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Time per problem showed a gradual rise, a relatively steady middle period, and a marked rise at the end, with no obvious correlation between time and accuracy scores. → W. S. Painter 1914
Evidence¶
W. S. Painter 1914¶
W. S. Painter. (1914). Efficiency in Mental Multiplication Under Extreme Fatigue. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/edu/
q1 · i? · causal · r1
Final-test record (Table II) of 28 four-place by five-place problems solved between 11:00 P.M. and 3:07+ A.M., with times in seconds and wrong figures per answer. The text reports "a gradual rise in time per problem from the first to the eighth, a relatively steady period from the 11th to the 18th problem and a marked rise" afterward.
"There appears to be no obvious correlation between the time and the accuracy scores."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Under extreme fatigue, mental multiplication efficiency ends at a definite, relatively abruptly appearing point rather than tailing off by degrees — related
- Late-afternoon memory work shows relative inefficiency of about 5-6 per cent compared with early-morning work in 13-year-old boys — related
- Improvement by practice continues in both morning and afternoon groups, but the morning group improves faster across weeks — related
- In one class of 13-year-old boys, memory scores were kept to a steady rank order by repeated practice (successive tests correlating +.87 to +.90) before fatigue testing began — related
- Test-retest correlations of memory span are low, questioning the validity of a single memory span test — related
- Psychological methods of fatigue measurement afford useful average values and reliable information about the course and effect of fatigue (Offner) — a broader claim this one bears on
- When four-place by four-place mental multiplication came to a standstill under extreme fatigue, ability to multiply any numbers was also lost — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
fatigue-time-rise-no-accuracy-correlation |
title |
During the final fatigue test, time per problem rose gradually, then markedly, with no obvious correlation between time and accuracy |
description |
During the final fatigue test, time per problem rose gradually, then markedly, with no obvious correlation between time and accuracy |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
1914 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — w-s-painter-1914 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.